This article was posted 08/29/2011 and is most likely outdated.

Mike Holt Newsletters
 

 

Subject - New York Passes Historic Green Jobs Financing Law

August 29, 2011
This newsletter was sent to 17632 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Continuing EducationQuizzes |  Free Stuff Instructors Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]  

New York Passes Historic Green Jobs Financing Law


By Daphne Livingston on June 23rd, 2011

ImageLong Island Press.com

Lawmakers this afternoon passed historic on-bill financing legislation to dramatically expand the state’s new energy efficiency retrofitting program, Green Jobs/Green NY. The new law will finally enable moderate-income property owners to access safe loans for retrofits, and use energy savings to repay the loan via their utility bills.
 
On-bill financing will open the door for NYSERDA, the state’s energy authority, to raise an estimated $5 billion in private investment in the state’s energy economy. Utility bills’ low default rates and strong collections leverage provide unprecedented security for green capital investing in building retrofits.
 
Green Jobs/Green NY was passed into law in 2009 with the goal of creating 60,000 job years (14,250 full time jobs), substantially reducing greenhouse gas emissions, and making one million homes and buildings more energy efficient – but it did not establish a financing mechanism to pay for the projects. On-bill financing will allow Green Jobs-Green NY to realize these goals.

The effort to pass on-bill financing was lead by Governor Andrew Cuomo, Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos, Assembly Energy Committee Chair Kevin Cahill and Senators George Maziarz, Kevin Parker and Mark Grisanti.
 
Dave Palmer, Executive Director of the Center for Working Families which designed both Green Jobs/Green NY and the on-bill financing program, said, “This is a simple and innovative solution to intertwined problems of climate change, joblessness and economic stagnation. It puts New York at the forefront of national efforts for a green economic recovery: We are the first state to implement on-bill financing on a statewide basis, and the first state to find the missing piece: ensuring that households can buy energy efficiency on the same safe terms as energy, and making deep, cost-saving energy upgrades widely available to working people. The Center for Working Families is proud to have led a bipartisan, multi-sector coalition of leaders and advocates to make Green Jobs/Green NY with on-bill financing a reality.”
 
On-bill financing uses future energy savings to cover the full cost of a state retrofit loan. Property owners will pay back the loan as a line item on their utility bill over time; the monthly repayment will be calibrated to the energy savings so that the loan doesn’t increase the bill. The program will give moderate income property owners access to energy-saving retrofits even if they cannot qualify for traditional bank loans.
 
By expanding the consumer demand for energy retrofits, on-bill financing will create tens of thousands of jobs in the green contracting sector and related industries like manufacturing and marketing. It will also increase productivity of consumer spending. Data shows that a dollar spent on construction and consumer goods produces two to three times more economic activity than a dollar spent on utility fuel.
 
The main elements of the on-bill financing legislation had been negotiated in early June. More recently, in the waning days of the legislative session, the Senate moved to linked power plant siting legislation to on-bill financing. The Senate’s move sparked concern from environmental justice advocates and threatened stalemate on important legislation. The Center for Working Families worked closely with all parties to ensure that the siting legislation would protect communities facing disproportionate environmental burdens. The result was two major legislative wins for New Yorkers.
 
Because of passage of on-bill financing, NYSERDA will be able to efficiently implement Green Jobs/Green NY. The energy authority recently awarded $6 million in outreach funds to community groups, whose success in recruiting customers and jobs depends largely on on-bill financing.
 
New York’s progress in implementing the Green Jobs/Green NY Act of 2009 is being closely watched by other states eager to replicate a mass-scale green jobs program.
 
Jackson Morris, Senior Policy Advisor at the Pace Energy and Climate Center, said, “With some of the most inefficient housing stock in the country, New York’s buildings account for over 60 percent of the state’s greenhouse gas emissions. By increasing access to energy efficiency programs, on-bill recovery will help achieve carbon reductions from homes, small businesses, and not-for-profits equivalent to removing over one million cars from the road. Enacting this innovative financing mechanism is a major breakthrough for scaling up energy efficiency in New York — policy makers across the nation should take note.”

 

Click here to post a comment

[ Post Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]
[ View More Newsletters ]

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

 

 
Comments
  • In my opinion, our NYS politicians want to keep funneling monies to the corrupt utilities. PACE financing is the program we have been advocating, as well as US VP J. Biden (See pacefinancing.org), since collection would go through the towns. This is an important distinction.

    Scott  September 7 2011, 10:14 am EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • scam!

    doug  August 31 2011, 9:12 pm EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • This appears to be yet another case of buying votes with someone else s money. Most of what the government does to save money equals 50% up for a 40% discount. Makes no sense at all.

    Applegramps  August 31 2011, 11:14 am EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • Interesting timing. This story on how similar programs are NOT working, ran yesterday:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/29/seattle-green-jobs-program-gets-20m-creates-14-posts/

    No return on the investment

    Dan  August 30 2011, 8:08 pm EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • Just left a meeting with Dept. of Energy. We are doing this very thing in a Federal Prison. No concerns about selling the property and moving off! I am hopeful that we can do some good with it.

    Wes  August 30 2011, 12:57 pm EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • The cynic in me says it'll never work, but it should. The most glaring examples I see are the ancient rental houses - wiring that could be featured in ECM magazine, no insulation, poor maintenance, etc. The renters are either poor college students or poorer folks. The landlord doesn't pay the utility bills and has no incentive to add insulation or new heating. The tenant is ineligible and not allowed to make these upgrades. Not sure if this addresses that issue.

    Matt  August 30 2011, 9:17 am EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • So what happens when the customer moves out of state? Is the new buyer of the house responsible, or is the loan taveling with the customer who now has to continue paying for the house they moved out of? What if the new owner rents the house out? does the renter assume the extra bill? I see way too many loop holes to stick the loan back on Big Daddy's shoulders.

    Clint  August 30 2011, 8:52 am EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • I don't see this working. For one thing, it involves government action interaction with utility companies. And then, how is one to determine that it was an energy saving improvement that saved energy versus a warmer than normal winter heating season? Or waht about a hotter than average summer and more AC being used that results in higher energy usage than an average sumer.

    OH - and what the heck is a "job year" ... leave it to the government to coin a new big number term.

    RonEl  August 30 2011, 8:14 am EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • Meanwhile... in the sunniest part of the United States

    http://southwest.construction.com/yb/sw/article.aspx?story_id=162603689&elq=46899da4a6a94b338b3844f5c567f3a6

    This is among the main reasons why Americans need to insist on owning their own rooftop (or parking canopy) solar installation. Keeping Banks, Utilities, Oil and auto companies out of the "loan" picture disables the long term negative effects that these monopolies have had on our economy and jobs. Creating a widely distributed (consumer owned) solar infrastructure will assist in ushering in the electric car age.

    Ralph  August 30 2011, 1:16 am EDT
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter