This article was posted 10/10/2007 and is most likely outdated.

250.6 Objectionable Current
 

 
Topic - NEC
Subject
- 250.6 Objectionable Current
Based on - NEC - 2005 Edition

October 25, 2007
This newsletter was sent to 1425 newsletter subscribers
 

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

250.6 Objectionable Current.

 

Question: Mike, how do you define the "objectionable current over grounding conductors" referred in NEC 70 Article 250.6(A) and its relationship with the "temporary currents not classified as objectionable currents" referred in NEC 70 Article 250.6(C) and "currents that introduce noise or data errors in electronic equipment not being classified as objectionable currents" referred in NEC 70 Article 250.6(D)? 

Answer: From my textbook Understanding the NEC, Volume 1

Image 1

 

 

 

 



250.6 Objectionable Current.

(A) Preventing Objectionable Current. To prevent a fire, electric shock, or improper operation of circuit-protection devices or sensitive equipment, electrical systems and equipment must be installed in a manner that prevents objectionable current from flowing on conductive materials, electrical equipment, or grounding and bonding paths.

Author's Comment: Objectionable current occurs because of improper neutral-to-case bonds and wiring errors.
Improper Neutral-to-Case Bond [250.142]

Panelboards. Objectionable current will flow on metal parts when the grounded neutral conductor is bonded to the metal case of a panelboard that is not part of service equipment. Figure 250-28

Disconnects. Objectionable current will flow on metal parts when the grounded neutral conductor is bonded to the metal case of a disconnecting means that is not part of service equipment. Figure 250-29

Separately Derived Systems. Objectionable current will flow on metal parts when the grounded neutral conductor is bonded at the transformer as well as to the metal case on the load side of the transformer. Figures 250-30 and 250-31



Figure 250-28
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-29
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-30
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-31
(Click on image to enlarge)

 
Wiring Errors

Objectionable current will flow on metal parts when the grounded neutral conductor from one system is connected to a circuit of a different system. Figure 250-32

Objectionable current will flow on metal parts when the equipment grounding (bonding) conductor is used as a grounded neutral conductor.

Example: A 240V time-clock motor is replaced with a 120V time-clock motor and the equipment grounding (bonding) conductor is used to feed one side of the 120V time clock. Another example is a 120V water filter wired to a 240V well-pump motor circuit, with the equipment grounding (bonding) conductor used for the neutral. Figure 250-33

Using the equipment grounding (bonding) conductor for the neutral is also seen in ceiling fan installations where the bare equipment grounding (bonding) conductor is used as a neutral and the white wire is used as the switch leg for the light, or where a receptacle is added to a switch outlet that doesn't have a neutral conductor. Figure 250-34

Author's Comment: Neutral currents always flow on a community metal underground water piping system because the grounded neutral conductor from each service is grounded to the underground metal water pipe. Figure 250-35
Dangers of Objectionable Current

Objectionable current on metal parts can cause electric shock, fires, and improper operation of sensitive electronic equipment and circuit-protection devices.

Shock Hazard. When objectionable current flows on metal parts, electric shock and even death can occur (ventricular fibrillation) from elevated voltage on the metal parts. Figure 250-36


Figure 250-32
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-33
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-34
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-35
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-36
(Click on image to enlarge)

Fire Hazard. When objectionable current flows on metal parts, a fire could occur because of elevated temperature, which can ignite adjacent combustible material. Heat is generated whenever current flows, particularly over high-resistive parts. In addition, arcing at loose connections is especially dangerous in areas containing easily ignitible and explosive gases, vapors, or dust. Figure 250-37

Improper Operation of Sensitive Electronic Equipment. Objec¬tionable current flowing on metal parts of electrical equipment and building parts can cause disruptive as well as annoying electromagnetic fields which can negatively affect the performance of sensitive electronic devices, particularly video monitors and medical equipment. For more information, visit www.MikeHolt.com, click on the Technical link, then on Power Quality. Figure 250-38

In addition, when objectionable current travels on metal parts, a difference of potential will exist between all metal parts, which can cause some sensitive electronic equipment to operate improperly (this is sometimes called a ground loop).

Improper Operation of Circuit-Protection Devices. When objectionable current travels on the metal parts of electrical equipment, nuisance tripping of electronic protection devices equipped with ground-fault protection can occur because some neutral current flows on the equipment grounding (bonding) conductor instead of the grounded neutral conductor.

(C) Temporary Currents Not Classified as Objectionable Currents. Temporary fault current on the effective ground-fault current path isn't classified as objectionable current. Figure 250-39

(D) Electromagnetic Interference (Electrical Noise). Currents that cause noise or data errors in electronic equipment aren't considered objectionable currents. Figure 250-40

Author's Comment: Some sensitive electronic equipment manufacturers require isolation between the metal parts of their equipment and the electrical system, yet they require their equipment to be connected to an independent ground (like a ground rod[s]). This practice violates 250.4(A)(5) and is very dangerous because the earth doesn't provide the low-impedance fault-current path necessary to clear a ground fault. Figure 250-41


Figure 250-37
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-38
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-39
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-40
(Click on image to enlarge)


Figure 250-41
(Click on image to enlarge)

 

 

 

 

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

Comments
  • 250-32 shows a picture of crossed neutrals and it says that the 208 panel board is off.then it shows a picture saying that the 277 panelboard is off?is this a mistake?

    jimmy
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike Holt

    Cordial Saludo,

    Recurro a ustedes para solicitarles una aclaración particular sobre las corrientes no deseadas (Objectionable current), qué valor en magnitud de corriente máxima puede ser considerada como aceptable por los conductores de puesta a tierra y cómo pueden ser estas eliminadas o minimizadas en un sistema eléctrico? Qué relación directa tienen los Stray Voltages con la presencia de estas corrientes?

    Agradezco de sus valiosos comentarios y aportes .

    Diego Valencia Serrato Ing. Electricista Pereira Colombia Sudamerica

    Diego Valencia Serrato
    Reply to this comment

  • The incorrecct, temporary installation of portable, three phase generators which feed exsisting subpanels, (480V /4wire) in buildings during maintenance outages presents seriuos O.C. levels. Electricians need to understand the system's configuration and when to apply and not the manufacturer's grounding instructions.

    MacZ
    Reply to this comment

  • Very good write-up. I am particularly interested in what value of current that flows back into Service B would make it objectionable, if any. See Figure 250-35

    joe
    Reply to this comment

  • The newsletter on objectionable current, looked at all the angles, it was great. Thanks for being so informative with your newsletters

    Dave Humphrey

    Dave Humphrey
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike:

    Is this article intended to or can it be applied to common mode noise current caused by the application of Pulse Width Modulated Variable Frequency Drives?? Common Mode noise currents are typically higher frequency but can cause electromagnetic interference with automated computerized control systems. Typically shielded cable is recommended between the drive and the motor with all motor grounding going back to the ground on the drive in order to conatain the noise between the drive and the motor. I geuss I am wondering if this article is a mandate to use shielded cable.

    Thanks again for a great newsletter Mike.

    -Scott Stocking Product Manager - Drives / MCC Equip French Gerleman Electric STL

    Scott
    Reply to this comment

  • Another "objectional" current can occur when conductive paths (metallic cold water service, CATV shield, etc.) run between houses. The unbalance current on a service may find that the path of least resistance is to the service neutral on the adjacent house. This leads to objectional current on materials not intended to carry current. Correction may require improvement of the service conductors or installation of a "break" in the conductive path.

    Mike Beanland
    Reply to this comment

  • I notice a comment that a current of over 5 AMPS was viewed as a problem. Should less than this be regarded as "not a problem"? I have a situation where all of the grounds have 2 to 3 AMPS on each ground wire but when the ground is taken loose, the contractor says he reads no voltage. I thot any current on the ground wire was a problem.

    Larry Nixon
    Reply to this comment

  • I have seen the grounded neutral of DT transformers bonded to case. This seems to happen frequently. Occasionally it's even shown this way on the plans. Happens with gensets, too.

    Jim
    Reply to this comment

  • We found less than one amp on a hydronic piping sysytem that was suffering from high iron content in the water.

    The problem was XO on an added on derived system that was improperly bonded at the transfomer and panels downstream.

    In this case, less than one amp was definitely "objectionable".

    Randy the chiller guy
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike,I request one clarification.Radio-frequency interference suppression filters fitted to data processing equipment may produce high earth leakage current.So the electronic equipment can itself be the source of objectionable current.In such a case,what does the Code say?Thanks.

    T.M.HAJA SAHIB
    Reply to this comment

  • Article 334.10(3) allows non-metallic sheathed cable to be installed in other structures if the construction type is lll, lV, or V. My concern is when the applied voltage is 277/480 Volts. The energy released in the event of a fault is of some concern. In my opinion I would delete this section, and request that commercial job using romex would be permitted on an individual basis allowing other voltages such as 120/208 single or three phase to be wired in romex. Thank You

    Ray Valdez
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike explains things so well.....really nothing I could add that the mighty holt has not already perfectly done.

    Paul Abernathy
    Reply to this comment

  • We in the "TEGG" Franchise, Use a criteria of 5 Amps or above measured on a ground is a problem that requires investigation of the bonding down stream of the measurement. This condition could indicate "Multiple Bonds" and creates a hazard to personel. I have seen equiptmant carrying as much as 20 Amps. through its frame.

    Matt
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter