This article was posted 11/27/2007 and is most likely outdated.

Feeder Taps
 

 

Topic - NEC
Subject - Feeder Taps

November 27, 2007
This newsletter was sent to 27560 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Feeder Taps

By Mike Holt for EC&M Magazine

 

Avoid feeling tapped out when trying to apply feeder tap rules.

 

Sometimes, it makes sense to “tap into” a feeder conductor to power another conductor. From Article 100, we know that a feeder conductor is a conductor that runs between service equipment (or a similar source) and the branch circuit Overcurrent Protective Device (OCPD). The conductor that’s tapped into a feeder conductor is called the tap conductor.

 

Now, think about this arrangement for a second. The OCPD supplies the feeder. You tap the feeder, making the feeder OCPD also the OCPD for the tap conductor. The OCPD is situated ahead of the point of supply to the tap conductor, because it’s situated ahead of the feeder.

 

Normally, you have to size the OCPD for the size and insulation of a given conductor, per 240.4. But in this arrangement, the OCPD is sized for the feeder conductor and is thus oversized for that tap conductor (not sized per 240.4). In such a situation, you have a feeder tap [240.2].

 

How do you keep your feeder tap from burning up? Getting an answer to that question is why we have 240.21(B), which provides the requirements for feeder taps. Unfortunately, 240.21(B) can easily confuse anyone trying to apply it. That confusion can leave you feeling tapped out as you scratch your head trying to sort out the requirements.

 

The first step in avoiding that problem is to understand two basic rules that apply to all feeder taps.

 

The first basic rule is this: You can’t tap a tap. That is, don’t use a tapped conductor to supply another conductor. This rule isn’t explicitly stated, but:

  • You can infer this rule from the first paragraph of 240.21(B).
  • By definition a feeder tap is to a feeder, not to a tap.

The second basic rule is “no upsizing.” This rule is explicitly stated in the first paragraph of 240.21(B): “The provisions of 240.4(B) shall not be permitted for tap conductors.”

The “next size up protection rule” [240.4(B]), which you can use for nontapped conductors, allows you to use the next highest OCPD above the ampacity of the conductors being protected. If you were trying to protect a 1 AWG feeder conductor, you’d go to Table 310.16 and see the conductor is rated at 130A. You could use a 150A circuit breaker (next size up) [240.4(B)]. But in a feeder tap situation, you can’t do that.

Does this mean you have to the size the feeder tap conductor to fit the OCPD, instead of the other way around? Well, sort of. Exactly how you size the tap conductor depends on its length and application. 240.21(B) provides five sets of requirements (let’s call them “scenarios”).

These two basic rules for feeder taps are simple. It’s the other rules that seem to lead to headaches and heartburn. So here’s your next great tip: look at each of the five scenarios, and pick the one that applies. Here are the scenarios:

  • Scenario One: Taps supplying a transformer (primary plus secondary not over 25 feet long).
  • Scenario Two: Outside taps of unlimited length.
  • Scenario Three: Taps not over 10 feet long.
  • Scenario Four: Taps 10 to 25 feet long.
  • Scenario Five: Taps over 25 feet long.

But how do you know which one to pick? Easy. You just have to answer three questions:

  • Will it feed a transformer with primary plus secondary not over 25 feet long? If so, choose Scenario One.
  • Is it being applied outdoors and you don’t want to be tied to a specific length? If so, choose Scenario Two.
  • For all other applications, how long is the tap conductor? Choose Scenario Three, Four, or Five.

Each scenario has different requirements, though you will find similarities as well. If you compare this list of scenarios to what’s actually in 240.21(B), you’ll see we present them in a different order. If you find this arrangement more logical and clear than the existing NEC arrangement, consider submitting a code change proposal for the arrangement of 240.21(B).

Scenario One: Taps supplying a transformer (primary plus secondary not over 25 feet long).

Obviously, you can’t exceed 25 feet in the total length of the primary and secondary conductors if you want to supply transformers via tap conductors (the exception being Scenario Two). The other requirements are as follows:

  • Size the primary tap conductors to an ampacity that’s at least one-third of the ampacity of the OCPD that protects the feeder conductors.
  • Size the secondary tap conductors to an ampacity that, when multiplied by the ratio of the primary-to-secondary voltage, is at least one-third the rating of the OCPD that protects the feeder conductors.
  • Protect primary and secondary conductors from physical damage by enclosing them in a manner approved by the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ), such as within a raceway. You’ll notice this requirement in the other scenarios, except Scenario Three.
  • Terminate the secondary conductors to a single circuit breaker (or set of fuses) rated no more than the tap conductor ampacity per 310.15 [Table 310.16].

Scenario Two: Outside feeder tap of unlimited length

Outside feeder tap conductors can be of unlimited length without an OCPD at the point they receive their supply if they are:

  • Protected from physical damage (enclosed in a manner approved by the AHJ, such as within a raceway).
  • Terminated at a single circuit breaker or a single set of fuses that limits the load to the ampacity of the conductors. This is how you get the “unlimited length” part, and it’s why there’s no 10% rule or 1/3 rule in this scenario.

Also:

  • The OCPD for the tap conductors must be an integral part of the disconnecting means or must be located immediately adjacent to it.
  • The disconnecting means must be in a readily accessible location, either outside the structure or nearest the point of entry of the conductors.

Scenario Three: Tap not over 10 feet long

You can install feeder tap conductors up to 10 ft long without an OCPD to the tap, if the tap conductors:

  • Have an ampacity that is at least the calculated load per Article 220 and the rating of the device or OCPD that the tap conductors supply.
  • Have an ampacity that is not less than 10 percent of the ampacity of the OCPD that protects the feeder. Note that the previously stated condition might not allow you to take advantage of this “10% rule.”
  • Don’t extend beyond the equipment they supply.
  • Are in a raceway, if they leave the enclosure.

The FPN under 240.21(B)(1) says to see 408.36 for the overcurrent protection requirements for panelboards.

Scenario Four: Tap 10 to 25 feet long

You can install feeder tap conductors up to 25 ft long without an OCPD on the tap, if they:

  • Have an ampacity that is at least one-third of the ampacity of the OCPD that protects the feeder.
  • Terminate in a single OCPD (breaker or set of fuses) rated no more than the tap conductor ampacity per 310.15 [Table 310.16].
  • Are protected from physical damage (enclosed in a manner approved by the AHJ, such as within a raceway).

Scenario Five: Tap over 25 feet long

In an industrial application (only), you can run feeder tap conductors up to 100 ft without an OCPD on the tap, if they:

  • Don’t contain splices.
  • Are 6 AWG copper or 4 AWG aluminum or larger.
  • Have an ampacity at least one-third of the ampacity of the OCPD that protects the feeder.
  • Don’t exceed 25 ft length horizontally or 100 ft in total
  • Don’t penetrate walls, floors, or ceilings.
  • Are protected from physical damage (enclosed in a manner approved by the AHJ, such as within a raceway).
  • Are at least 30 ft from the floor.
  • Terminate in a single circuit breaker (or set of fuses) rated no more than the tap conductor ampacity per 310.15 [Table 310.16].

Also, supervision must ensure only qualified persons service such installations. This seems like an awful lot of requirements for an unlikely application—a tap conductor over 25 feet long. But things aren’t always as they seem. The application is actually fairly common. Examples include high-bay manufacturing buildings and warehouses, which can easily have walls over 35 ft tall.

So, now you have an easy way to zero in on feeder tap conductor requirements. The next time a feeder tap project leaves you feeling tapped out, stop to answer three easy questions about your project. Then, pick the one scenario that describes your application. From there, it’s pretty simple.

 

 

Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • Thank you for a very informative article.

    Romeo
    Reply to this comment

  • This is a very good article. I always have a hard time explaining tap rules to my designers. I will forward this to all of them and hoplefully it will help them understand better. Thank you

    Mike Dionne
    Reply to this comment

  • In Scenario 1: "Size the secondary tap conductors to an ampacity that, when multiplied by the ratio of the primary-to-secondary voltage, is at least one-third the rating of the OCPD that protects the feeder conductors."

    Would you be kind enough to show the arithmetic for this? An example?

    David
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike this is a very good article. Helps to understand the tap rules when you get information like this.

    D. Newman
    Reply to this comment

  • Great Article. Thanks Mike

    mike pagano
    Reply to this comment

  • Thanks, Mike, for helping to simplify this area.

    Unless I misunderstand, here are a couple of clarifications that might also be helpful. 1. Under the "Next size up rule" section perhaps it should be noted that this rule still applies to the feeder but not to the tap. 2. Under your scenario 1., on the last point; perhaps we could clarify by stating that the OCPD that the secondary tap conductors terminate to needs to protect the primary and secondary taps and the transformer.

    To illustrate, let me zero in on Davids question above. Lets say, David, that we're tapping into a feeder fed from a 480V supply protected by a 300 A OCPD and the transformer powered by the tap has a secondary voltage of 120V. Our ratio is 4 to 1. Using table 310.16 as allowed in 310.15(B) my primary tap must have an ampacity of AT LEAST 100 A, as in a #3 75 degree conductor. (1/3 of 300 A) And since my transformer ratio is 4 to 1, my secondary must have an ampacity of AT LEAST 400 A as in a 250 kcm 75 degree conductor. Hence my OCPD that my secondary tap terminates on must be 400 A OR LESS, protecting both primary and secondary taps. Also implied is that my transformer must be rated 48 KVA OR LARGER so that it will also be protected.

    Hope this helps, Wes

    Wes Gerrans
    Reply to this comment

  • Question: For a 3 phase multiple conductor service in a wireway, and several multiple-conductor taps to fused disconnect switches, for load balance, does "Phase A" of each paralleled tap conductor have to be connected to each "Phase A" of the paralled service conductors?, ditto for phases B & C? e.g., if the service (in the wireway) is 3 sets of 4-600 MCM (1200 A), and there are 3-400 A taps of 2 sets of 4-#3/0 ea., please describe the connections within the wireway for balance.

    Wyatt
    Reply to this comment

  • This is a saver! Very good explanation!

    Bob Great
    Reply to this comment

  • Mike,

    Concerning overcurrent protection for transformer secondary, you stated that, "The second basic rule is “no upsizing.” This rule is explicitly stated in the first paragraph of 240.21(B): “The provisions of 240.4(B) shall not be permitted for tap conductors.”

    However, according to Table 450.3(A), Note 1 and the non-applicability of 240.4(B), the inference here is that we CAN increase the size of the overcurrent device to the next standard size as long as the ampacity of the secondary conductors being protected is greater than the overcurrent device.

    Sam Alexander
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter