This article was posted 11/30/-0001 and is most likely outdated.

Current Limiting Fuse and Arc Flash
 


 
Topic - Safety
Subject - Current Limiting Fuse and Arc Flash

December 19, 2005 

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
  Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    
Current Limiting Fuse and Arc Flash

Question: Mike, I am wondering how many folks are finding that they have some pretty nasty areas at their main service entrances when looking at the arc flash conditions present. For years I pressed for current limiting fuses in main switches where ever possible. Now that we have had an update to our fault current study and an arc flash report prepared we are seeing that these nice current limiting fuses really are not doing that much for arc flash. If I'm understanding the calculations used for arc flash it is not the available fault current but some "reasonable" value, like maybe 75% used ...

Well we are seeing that when this value is used you push the fuse out of the current limiting range in a lot of instances. The 2000 amp Class L fuse I expect to clear in less than a cycle is taking 1 second to clear.

This makes the PPE requirements excessive and in some instances we get a "stay out period, do not work on this equipment while energized" determination. Anyhow, just wondering if you've seen/heard similar tales...

Thanks again for sharing your knowledge of electrical systems...

Jim Koryta

Answer from Cooper Bussman: Mike, let me try to help answer James Koryta's question. The arc-flash energy associated with a 2000 ampere overcurrent device is horrific, whether that device is a current-limiting fuse or a circuit breaker. Actually, the energy level let-through for all devices above 800 or 1200 amperes becomes a real concern. It is a matter of the length of time that it takes for the fuse or circuit breaker to open. For current-limiting fuses or current-limiting circuit breakers, the higher the available short-circuit current, the higher the available arcing current, the greater chance that the current-limiting device will be in its current-limiting range.

Once the device is in its current-limiting range, the arc-flash energy is drastically reduced. But as James points out, the available arcing current is not always high enough to cause the current-limiting device to be in its current-limiting range. For example the arc-flash energy let through by a 1200 ampere Class L fuse with 50,000 (or greater) short-circuit amperes available will be .39 calories per cm squared or lower. However, with only 30,000 short-circuit amperes available, the arc-flash energy is 5.16 calories per cm squared. Believe me, a 5 calorie per cm squared event is one that you would never forget, if you lived through it.

Is there an advantage to using current limitation? Absolutely. What would the arc-flash energy be if a short-time delay for 30 cycles were utilized to obtain selective coordination? At 30,000 short circuit amperes available, the arc-flash energy jumps from 5.16 calories to 58.01 calories. Simple arc-flash calculator .

Does a current-limiting device always protect the worker so that they do not have to wear heavy layers of PPE? Absolutely not!

So what else can be done for these larger circuits?
•  Require insulated bus where available to help prevent the arcing fault from ever starting.
•  Utilize a shunt-trip on switches and fused circuit breakers above 800 amperes that opens the switch when the first fuse opens.
•  Utilize zone-selective interlocking where available.
•  Utilize instantaneous trips rather than short-time delay.
•  Utilize smaller overcurrent devices whenever possible. For example divide a load into five 800 ampere devices instead of one, 4000 ampere device.
•  Keep feeder runs as short as possible to keep the available short-circuit current as high as possible, so as to be in the current limiting range of the current-limiting fuse or current-limiting circuit breaker.
•  Specify arc-resistant switchgear (actually arc-diverting switchgear) where available. See Powell
•  Utilize vacuum interrupter equipment (For example see Cooper Power Vacuum Fault Interrupter ) on the primary side of a substation transformer that can be triggered by an arcing event on the secondary side of the transformer. Such equipment can open in about 3 cycles after receiving a trip signal. The trigger might be from a device such as the one below.
•  Utilize relays that look for both an overcurrent condition and the light of the arc, and then send a signal to open the circuit. ( For example see ABB )
•  Utilize relays that change the settings from short-time delay to instantaneous whenever a person is working on or near the switchgear, and then changes back to short-time delay when the person leaves. ( See Siemens on page 7 .)

I hope that this has been helpful. It would be great if this would have been a total solution, but unfortunately, it's not. It is refreshing to see that so many
manufacturers are working on solutions ( see our safety material ) and that so many users are putting the safety programs in place to protect their employees, as best as possible, from these hazards. Thanks for the opportunity to respond.

Vince Saporita
Vice President Technical Marketing and Services
Cooper Bussmann
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments ]

Low-Voltage and Power-Limited Systems DVD
This full-color, illustrated textbook with corresponding DVD provides insight into many of the technical rules of the 2005 NEC that apply to these systems. Subjects include the NEC rules that apply to low-voltage and limited-energy systems that most people are not aware of, definitions, the general NEC installation requirements, and specific NEC requirements for control, sound, video, CATV, CCTV, antennas, telephone, fiber optics, etc. Topics include grounding, cable installation, spacing, support, etc. This program is suitable for Low Voltage exam preparation and the textbook includes practice questions, quizzes, and a final exam

Product Code: 05LED
Price:
$169.00 each

 
[ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments ] [ View More Newsletters ]

F o r w a r d   t h i s   N e w s l e t t e r   t o   a   F r i e n d !
Do you have a friend, relative, or colleague who you think would be interested in receiving this free newsletter? If so, we encourage you to forward this message along to them. If you received this email from someone else, and wish to receive your own free issues of our newsletter, sign up today!

C o n t a c t    I n f o r m a t i o n
   
 

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Comments
  • I would say first off that deenergizing the circuit would be the first thing I would do. If an arc is occuring disconnect the output as capacitors are in the circuit as a DC source. At 20 amps you start welding not arcing. I could only imagine a 3/8" steel plate at 2000 amps, you would blow a pretty deep trench into it and probably blow through. I look at my PGE entrance and see 250 amps services, and this is at a 20KWH gas station. Who but an aluminum smelter needs that kind of wattage.

    Cheers

    GasMan
    Reply to this comment

  • Wonderful news letter. Thanks Mr. Holt.

    When we say insulated bus bars. Are not we thinking one thing and saying another? Ar bus bars insulated with primary insulation (such as Hot work gloves would be) or are we talking about a lesser level that is intended to limit arc-over type events?

    Wow, a fuse guy recommending adding an electromechanical device (shunt trip! DO NOT SHUNT TRIP DEVICES add to the time a device takes to clear a fault? i have been under the impression that melting element type devices were faster than e_m type devices> please advise> and thanks much for your professional efforts> LW

    L. W. Brittian
    Reply to this comment

  • Different current limiting overcurrent protective devices offer the ability to current limit, only in conjunction with their time-current characteristics. You may find that at lower fault current (and associated arc flash fault current), a current limiting circuit breaker will offer reduced arc flash incident energy as compared to an equivalent current limiting fuse (operating outside of its current limiting range). The reverse is also true, that at high fault currents (the term high is relative to the ampacity of the protective device), a current limiting fuse may offer faster clearing, and reduced arc flash incident energy as compared to an equivalent current limiting circuit breaker. It must be evaluated, and not blanketly stated that a current limiting device of any type will reduce fault current. Different ones are better than others at different fault currents.

    Ron Shapiro
    Reply to this comment

  • This newsletter has opened my eyes in regards to current limiting devices and how they actually operate. It is good to see that Vince was willing to provide information that may not help the sales for his company. That always goes a long way in my "book". So much to learn and so little time.

    Pierre
    Reply to this comment

  • I say amen to all that Vince has said. One thing to keep in mind is that Class L fuses (above 600 amperes)are generally used at the main incoming supply and are designed to limit nuisance opening due to normal inrush and starting currents. In general, the proper use of Class J, T, or Class RK1 fuses downstream of the class L will greatly reduce arc flash incident energy. Another thing to keep in mind is that even if you set instantaneous response on circuit breakers that have been in the field for a long time, they may not respond as expected. Circuit breakers must be maintained and tested reqularly to assure instantaneous response.

    Ken Cybart Littelfuse, Inc.

    Kenneth Cybart
    Reply to this comment

  • So, inlight of the above discussions, what is the best way to determine the maximum interrupting range of a particular fuse?


    Reply to this comment

  • Great question and answer from Vince. One additional design change that can easily be implemented to help protect the worker is High-Resistance Grounding (HRG).

    HRG systems reduce phase-ground fault currents from 50,000A to 5A so that there is no Arc Flash Hazard per IEEE Std 141-1993 (Red Book) section 7.2.2.

    It has been very well documented that ~85-90% of all faults are phase-ground faults. So, HRG reduces the risk of injury by 85-90%.

    Due to recent technology, most disadvantages associated with HRG have been resolved. Caution: HRG does not protect against phase-phase faults, so the worker must still consider these hazards. However, the overall risk has been significatly reduced.

    Tony Locker
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter