This article was posted 02/23/2011 and is most likely outdated.

Common Ground in Article 100 - Based on the 2011NEC
 

 

Topic - NEC
Subject -
Common Ground in Article 100 - Based on the 2011 NEC

February 23, 2011
This newsletter was sent to 16666 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Continuing EducationQuizzes |  Free Stuff Instructors Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]  

Common Ground in Article 100 – Based on the 2011 NEC

By Mike Holt for EC&M Magazine

Misunderstandings occur when people have different ideas of what words mean. The NEC contains Article 100 (Sidebar 1) for this reason. There, you’ll find definitions of key terms that appear in more than one Article (key terms appearing in only one Article are defined at the start of that Article).

The definitions can change in any NEC revision, so revisiting key terms is essential. And that’s what we’re doing here. Some of the changes may surprise you.

Coming to terms

Ampacity. The maximum current, in amperes, a conductor can carry continuously, where the temperature of the conductor won’t be raised in excess of its insulation temperature rating.

Analysis: The ampacity of a conductor is the maximum current it can carry (under the conditions of use), continuously, without exceeding its temperature rating. Previous editions of the Code didn’t include the word “maximum” in the definition, although a maximum seemed fairly obvious. This change corrects that omission.

Bathroom. An area that includes a basin and one or more of the following: toilet, urinal, tub, shower, bidet, or similar plumbing fixture.

Analysis: All 15A and 20A, 125V receptacles in bathrooms must be GFCI protected [210.8(A)(1)]. As nontraditional plumbing fixtures (e.g., bidets) and small rooms for their use are becoming more common, this definition needed updating. If a room contains only a basin and bidet, people call it a bathroom.

Bonding Conductor or Jumper. A conductor that ensures electrical conductivity between metal parts of the electrical installation.

Analysis: The 2008 NEC (and previous editions) referred only to “bonding jumpers.” This implies a short conductor, but length isn’t actually part of the meaning. For example, bonding conductors that connect grounding electrodes can be several feet long and bonding jumpers for communications systems electrodes may exceed 20 feet.

Bonding Jumper, System. The connection between the neutral conductor and the supply-side bonding jumper or equipment grounding conductor, or both at a separately derived system.

Analysis: The previous definition described the system bonding jumper (Sidebar 2) as a connection between the neutral conductor and the equipment grounding conductor. While this often correct, it isn’t always correct. When the system bonding jumper is installed at the source of a separately derived system, the connection is between the neutral conductor and the supply-side bonding jumper that’s routed to the first disconnect (typically a panel) of the derived system. This change addresses the inaccuracy of the previous language.

And because the NEC uses this term in more than just Article 250 (e.g., Article 708), it’s been moved from 250.2 to Article 100.

Ground Fault. An unintentional electrical connection between an ungrounded conductor and the metal parts of enclosures, raceways, or equipment.

Analysis: The NEC moved this definition from 250.2 to Article 100 because it’s in multiple Articles.

Grounding Conductor. This term is no longer in the NEC.
Analysis: Recent revisions to Articles 100 and 250 have made this term obsolete. The definition of “grounding conductor” has become nearly identical to the definition of “grounding electrode conductor,” resulting in confusion. The two terms have been (incorrectly) used interchangeably in past NEC editions. For example, in the 2008 Code, 250.64 refers to the installation of “grounding electrode conductors,” yet 250.64(A) refers to “grounding conductors,” not “grounding electrode conductors.”

The use of more accurate and more specific terms, such as “grounding electrode conductor,” “bonding jumper,” or “bonding conductor,” in place of “grounding conductor” helps clarify the intention of the NEC.

Interrupting Rating. The highest short-circuit current at rated voltage the device is identified to interrupt under standard test conditions.

Analysis: The previous definition of interrupting rating referred to a device that’s “intended” to interrupt current. This change uses a defined term (“identified”) instead of an undefined one (“intended”).

Intersystem Bonding Termination. A device that provides a means to connect bonding conductors for communications systems to the grounding electrode system, in accordance with 250.94.

Analysis: The previous definition said where to locate this device (at the service equipment). This was a requirement inside of definition, and that’s never a good idea. Also, this structure isn’t allowed by the NFPA NEC Manual of Style. This revision removes the requirements from the definition, leaving them in Article 250 where they belong.

Separately Derived System. A wiring system whose power is derived from a source of electric energy or equipment other than the electric utility service. This includes a generator, a battery, a solar photovoltaic system, a transformer, or a converter winding, where there’s no direct electrical connection from circuit conductors of one system to circuit conductors of another system, other than connections through the earth, metal raceways, or equipment grounding conductors.

Analysis: The NEC previously said a separately derived system must not have any connections between itself and another system (such as the utility supply). While this makes good sense, it isn’t possible in all applications. Connections between systems occur through metallic enclosures, raceways, and similar equipment. They also occur the through earth via grounding electrodes. This change clarifies that such incidental interconnections are permitted.

Service Conductors, Overhead. Overhead conductors between the service point and the first point of connection to the service-entrance conductors at the building/structure.

Analysis: This is the first of many changes to terms related to the service and service conductors. These changes are part of a collective effort to help Code users understand the subtle differences between the many different types of service conductors.

Service Conductors, Underground. Underground conductors between the service point and the first point of connection to the service-entrance conductors in a terminal box, meter, or other enclosure, inside or outside the building wall.

Analysis: This new term distinguishes between service lateral conductors and other service conductors installed underground. Underground service conductors are on the customer side of the service point, whereas service laterals (also installed underground) are on the utility side of the service point.

Service Drop. Overhead conductors between the utility electric supply and the service point.

Analysis: This term has been revised to clarify that only overhead conductors on the utility side of the service point are considered a service drop. Conductors installed overhead on the customer side are now “overhead service conductors.”

The definition of “service conductors” states that only conductors on the customer side of the service point are service conductors, so “service conductor” isn’t used here. A service drop does not contain service conductors.

Service-Entrance Conductors, Overhead System. The conductors between the terminals of service equipment and service drop or overhead service conductors.

Analysis: The change clarifies that overhead service-entrance conductors begin at the end of the service drop or at the end of customer-owned overhead service conductors. These conductors end at the service equipment. Because they’re on the customer side of the service point, they’re service conductors.

Service-Entrance Conductors, Underground System. The conductors between the terminals of service equipment and service lateral or underground service conductors.

Analysis: This change clarifies that underground service entrance conductors begin at the end of the utility’s service lateral or at the end of customer-owned underground service conductors. These conductors end at the service equipment. Because they’re on the customer side of the service point, they’re service conductors.

Service Lateral. Underground conductors between the utility electric supply and the service point.

Analysis: This change clarifies that only underground conductors on the utility side of the service point are a “service lateral.” Conductors installed underground on the customer side are now “underground service conductors.”

Service Point. [Article 230]. The point where the electrical utility conductors make contact with premises wiring.

Analysis: The term “service point” is an important definition. It’s also such a simple one that it isn’t always fully understood. It’s the point where the serving utility ends and the premises wiring begins. The service point can be at the utility transformer, at the service weatherhead, or at the meter socket enclosure. Exactly where depends on where the utility conductors terminate.

Stay clear

As you go about your electrical work, you’re likely to be speaking with someone who’s using the old definitions and thus thinking one thing while saying another. That’s never a good situation. To correct it, review the current Article 100 definitions during each discussion in which key terms crop up.
Don’t assume you understand or are understood. Make sure.

Sidebar 1. What’s in 100?
Article 100 has two parts:

  • Part I. Defines terms used throughout the Code for systems operating up through 600V, nominal.
  • Part II. Defines terms that apply to systems operating at over 600V nominal.

Sidebar 2. Why a system bonding jumper?
The system bonding jumper provides a low-impedance fault current path to the power supply, to facilitate the clearing of a ground fault (by opening the circuit overcurrent device). For more information, see 250.4(A)(5), 250.28, and 250.30(A)(1).

 

Click here to post a comment

[ Post Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]
[ View More Newsletters ]

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

 

 
Comments
  • In a two wire circuit supplying 120V from a panelboard to a duplex receptacle, how do we now refer to the circuit, 2 conductor with ground, 2 conductor with bond, 2 conductor with jumper or 3 conductor, or what? Thanks.

    Wayne Atkinson  February 26 2011, 10:35 pm EST
    Reply to this comment

  • does any NEC refer to (something being grandfathered) under the code, or did we as electrician make that up, help me i cant find it in the NEC.

    tracy  February 24 2011, 7:10 pm EST
    Reply to this comment

  • I had always understood that there was only a single "grounding electrode conductor" ( from the system grounding electrode to the service equipment) in a system and that all other conductors intended to provide a fault path were "grounding conductors". Since, as you state, that "bonding conductors" and "grounding conductors" are not the same, do we then refer to the formerly called "grounding conductors" as grounding electrode conductors?

    Thank you.

    Michael Berryman  February 24 2011, 9:14 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • This is very good information that we all need to know. Thanks.

    Joe Ramsay  February 24 2011, 8:53 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • This is a great step forward, I'm glad to see better deffinitions to services

    Darren Eaton  February 24 2011, 8:46 am EST
    Reply to this comment

  • Just a reminder that the IEEE Green Book committee is now debating the terms Ground and Earth; Grounding/Earthing and so forth, in keeping with the IEC concept. Will the NEC follow? Will have to wait and see.

    Curtis Leary  February 24 2011, 7:56 am EST
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter