This article was posted 12/08/2008 and is most likely outdated.

Interesting Question from an Engineer
 

 

Subject - Interesting Question from an Engineer

December 8, 2008
This newsletter was sent to 30563 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Weekly Code GraphicQuizzes |  Free Stuff InstructorsOnline Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Interesting Question from an Engineer

Mike,

I’d like to ask your opinion on compression couplings versus set screw type. I work for an A & E firm and have been an electric power engineer for 48 years, and counting.  Our company standards call for compression couplings exclusively and have for as long as I know.

 

However, contractors who I respect for their experience and integrity (which is not all of them) state that set screw fittings are equal and in some ways better than compression.  And I think I agree, at least do not disagree, as I do not and never have regarded conduits as grounds. That being the case, I see little reason for compression couplings in most of our projects which are not in areas of high vibration, long vertical runs, long distanced between supports, conduit abuse, etc.

 

Your thoughts would be welcome.

 

Thanks, Kevin Cassidy

 

Mike Holt’s Response: Kevin, I never could figure out why compression fittings were part of specifications; to me SS fitting are equal to or better than compression fittings.
Click here to post a comment
[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Experiencing a Problem? Click Here

 
Comments
  • To all my fellow electrical types, I have also been on both sides of the fence, (Mechanic, Installer, Contractor, Engineer, Owner and State Inspector). I have been on jobs that the AHJ required or liked one connector/coupling over the other. I was also on one job that two journeymen got into a fist fight over this same issue. Both serve a purpose. So far no one has brought up: NEC 2008, Article 110.3 Examination, Identification, Installation, and Use of Equipment, (A) Examination. (B) Installation and Use. If the EMT connector/coupling is properly installed as listed you should not have any problems? I have been doing electrical work for 27 years, for me the use of these parts is based on: Environment, Time, Cost, Code Rules and also if I can make my local inspector feel good about the job. Compression fitting do cover more surface area. A ½” EMT connector/coupling, set screw has a No.10 set screw, this has a contact area of 0.02761” at one contact point. A ½” EMT compression fitting with an inside diameter of 0.7150” has two contact points on the bushing this contact area is 2.24624” x 2 = 4.49248”surface area. So if I was to use the EMT as a ground path as listed in Article 358.60, I think I would use a compression fitting. Just my opinion. Remember no fist fights.

    Ozzie Woodcock

    Ozzie Woodcock

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter