Visit MikeHolt.com
Public Shock and Electrocution Highest During Summer Months  
 
Image

What makes public shock and electrocution cases so unique is they occur in areas where we don't normally expect electrical hazards to exist: principally our city sidewalks, streets and play areas.

PORT ST. LUCIE, Fla., June 1, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- Database analysis on public shock and electrocution cases collected by Utility Testing and Geographic Information Systems (UT/GIS, UTGIS) shows summertime, but more specifically the month of June, as being the most hazardous period for humans during the year from electrical faults on publically accessible municipal and utility infrastructure equipment. This equipment typically includes metal street light poles, pools/fountains, junction boxes and fences, but coordinated testing programs have also found unsafe voltage levels on fire hydrants, phone booths, bus shelters and amusement park rides to name a few others.

According to UTGIS President Mark Voigtsberger. "While electrical faults on municipal and utility infrastructure equipment occurs all year long, bare feet, open-toe shoes and exposed skin surfaces increase the hazard potential during the summer time frame." Voigtsberger recommends trying to develop a situational awareness to reduce the possibility of public shock and electrocutions this summer. "The visual symptoms of someone being shocked or electrocuted are identical to scores of other possible medical conditions. Take stock of the situation before trying to rescue someone or if you think you are being shocked. You may only have a few seconds to make a life or death decision."

For more information contact:

Mark Voigtsberger, President
(888) 78-UTGIS
UT/GIS
PO Box 881585
Port St Lucie, FL, 34988-1585
www.utgis.com

 
Click Here to Post a Comment Click Here to View Comments Click Here to Unsubscribe
 
 
Visit: Exam Preparation | Continuing Education | Code Products | Newsletters | and more
Copyright© Mike Holt Enterprises of Leesburg, Inc. All Rights Reserved This article is protected by United States copyright laws and may not be published without prior written permission.
Mike Holt Enterprises of Leesburg, Inc. 3604 Parkway Blvd. Suite 3 Leesburg, FL 34748
"... as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord." [Joshua 24:15]
Comments

  • Hi Bruce

    I just sent Mike a chart that should answer your question. I do not know what your term "electrical contact" means.....but took a stab in the dark and considered it to mean "electrical shock".

    Under a soon to be approved IEEE Standard (1695, Guide to Understanding, Diagnosing and Mitigating Stray and Contact Voltage) there is no formal distinction between voltage potential levels that produce shocks and those that produce electrocutions as it applies to "Contact Voltage". Human shocks and electrocutions due to Contact Voltage is what this newsletter is about, although we did not use the term in the write up. In many cases where a public electrocution has occurred, others have come forward and stated they had received an electrical shock on that same object. This is why our data was combined in the original chart on this newsletter- what is a shock to one person could take the life of another.

    I disagree with you on one point: "The combination of these two distinct areas of electrical contact are typically done to over-emphasize the seriousness of the problem".

    Generally, people (meaning pedestrians) do not report electrical shocks if they or their dog gets a little tingle from an object like a light pole- they simply go on their way.

    Mobile scanning of cities by myself and other firms find very large numbers of publicly accessible objects with contact voltage potential on them. 30+ energized objects per night is normal. Some are at full phase voltage, but many are 1-5 volts. Almost all of these could produce a shock or electrocution under the right conditions, but when cross referenced, none were reported to 911 or 311 call centers.

    Because public electrocutions usually make the local or national news, we believe those numbers to be somewhat accurate.

    When looking at the number of public electrical shocks due to contact voltage, we believe that number to be greatly under reported.

    Based on actual field testing, the number of found publicly accessible objects with voltage potentials high enough to shock or electrocute a human is substantially higher than the cases reported in the attached chart.

    Hope this addressed your questions,

    Mark

      June 15 2016, 12:18 pm EDT
Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter