This article was posted 04/22/2011 and is most likely outdated.

10 More Ways to Become a Third World Utility
 

 


Subject -
10 More Ways to Become a Third World Utility

April 22, 2011
This newsletter was sent to 16974 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Continuing EducationQuizzes |  Free Stuff Instructors Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]  

10 More Ways to Become a Third World Utility

By Jim Burke

Image1 One of the advantages of old age is you can say more of what you actually think.  Having been in the utility business for over 40 years, I’ve seen many things. I’ve noticed that many ideas are re-invented every 10 or 20 years and my insight into the fate of some of these ideas is misinterpreted as “unusual insight”.  I’m thinking “fool me once…etc.”.    There have been any number of things which concern me.  

 Some years ago I wrote a paper “10 Ways to Become a Third World Utility” that was very well received….a big surprise to me!!  I’ve got another 10 here, which are meant to be constructive and parallel what many of you are really thinking but not in a position to broadcast to the world.

  1. Allow the Lawmakers to Do the Engineering
  2. Let Computer Programs Replace Intuition and Experience
  3. Mirror the Airline Industry
  4. Provide No Career Path in Engineering
  5. Don’t Take a Stand
  6. Encourage DG’s
  7. Withdraw support of colleges and universities
  8. Support Global Warming Alarmists
  9. No Research or Papers
  10. Don’t State Your Case to the Public

Click here to read or download this paper.

 

Click here to post a comment

[ Post Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]
[ View More Newsletters ]

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

 

 
Comments
  • Regarding Item 8, I tried to find the March 14, 2008 report from NOAA stating "that almost all the ice allegedly lost in the Artic is back" but I could not find it. Please post a link.

    I did find a 2010 "Arctic Report Card" through NOAA's website that stated Arctic ice is decling, including the statement "Return to previous Arctic conditions is unlikely" on the front page: http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/ArcticReportCard_full_report.pdf

    Looks to me that your rebuttal of so-called "Global Warming Alarmists" is likely on rather thin ice.

    John Bravard  April 25 2011, 9:34 pm EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • This 10 year old document could use some serious updating. Some companies are beginning to release "plug & play" type solar assemblies with integrated A/C for rooftops, at a more reasonable cost (and less labor) , much of what the article addresses appears to be outdated technologically. The latest huge oil spills and nuclear disasters highlight the fact that the logic from 10 years ago will not survive. Utilities are beginning to be more mistrusted for the politics they use to keep in place the status quo. They keep trying to use their "expertise" to stifle clean renewable energy development for the rooftop sized consumer.

    Back off of the regulations! Instead, make it easier and more cost effective for consumers to own safe sources of power production. With the growing needs of the data world, ) on line multimedia education using streaming 3D with virtual-digital, books.) there will be plenty of opportunity to expand existing utility power resources.

    Ralph Perez  April 25 2011, 10:47 am EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • All of the preceding comments make excellent points. I would add that the government (lawmakers) gets involved in engineering and other utility issues because the utility won’t.

    Utilities are like any other big business: maximum profit at minimum cost. PCB’s are an example of an issue that they would have loved to ignored. The trend in big business in the past few decades has been for maximizing profits, thus eliminating education, eliminating incentives for employees with longevity, eliminating workers who know how things work (who needs those high priced union employees?).

    Much of this type of reasoning goes back to the elimination of taxes on capital gains, which in turned eliminated the re-investment in the business itself. All of the money made is paid out to shareholders, leaving very little to keep the utility prepared for the future.

    We reap what we sew.

    Flying Sparks  April 25 2011, 9:58 am EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • My 'meta' understanding of both lists is that these negative trends are common to all engineering disciplines, and have been an active influence in American technology for perhaps 20 years. As for the the extremes of politicol left and politcol right in the U.S., the reactionaries will always get their 15 minutes. Rational, competent engineers do not make good press and do not make good sound-bites for congressional hearings.

    As for nuclear power - we would not need it if there were not too many people, and if the economic system did not require technological heroism to sustain an insane growth rate. But the extreme left and right will never allow an educational system that emphasizes zero growth for population or for the reduction of capitol wasted in western equity systems that does not contribute to GDP. Human population and economic systems have failed - so we must accept the associated risk of nuclear power.

    As for the scientists, I do not doubt the concept of global warming, but I doubt their skill set. I have encountered a PhD biologist (USCD), and a PhD etymologist (UCB) that had no higher math, and neither could understand my undergrad-level 2d order PDEs. So I have reason to doubt the efficacy of the timeline, and/or the rate of change, and/or the predicted affects of increased temperatures.

    Brian  April 24 2011, 2:52 pm EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • As a Master Electrician, trained in the US Navy and the state of Connecticut, and having studied the environment in a UNiversity setting for 6 1/2 years, I find one of your ten comments completely stupid and under the influence of Joe the plumber and his republican counterparts. If you can't realize the damage done to our planet by burning fossil fuels, there's no hope for you. Stay ignorant, or get informed, and not by fox news.

    Thanks.

    Tom Grocki  April 24 2011, 12:53 pm EDT
    Reply to this comment

  • As someone who has worked in the past on a new nuke with second thoughts about the economonic and safety issues my mind is made up. As a species we cannot stop meltdowns because its like almost everything else, it is all about the money. False economy nearly caused a reactor containment failure and god knows what else Davis Bessey brought to you by the same penny pinching private power company that started the last big blackout on the east coast. Speaking of blackouts, they are very dangerous to nuck powerhouses since we require only 4 hours of backup power and when all the power is gone things start getting hot, boiling hot, Tokyo Electric Power lost 4 reactors and they had the required 8 hours of backup power until it drowned in the same tsnumi that destroyed the grid connection caused by the earthquake that almost certainly damaged to these plants cooling systems to begin with. And it is not over for the Japanese with this nuclear nightmare.What to do with the waste produced at nukes is an unsolved issue and this is not a small issue. Building out our renewables,drastically better fuel economy for cars and trucks, dracastic new standards for efficiency in everything that consumes power has never been looked at seriously and needs to be. The interests of the well lobbied few cannot continue to destroy innovation that is vital to solving our energy needs. If you can't picture smaller cars, windmills, solar produced power and hot water, factories that use 80% less energy you haven't been to Germany. I can picture those things here and if all of the equipment is manufactured here I can also picture jobs by the millions.

    Sam Woods  April 23 2011, 11:21 pm EDT
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter