This article was posted 05/30/2006 and is most likely outdated.

Article 725: Class 2 and 3 Remote-Control, Signaling, and Power-Limited Circuits (Part 2 of 2)
 

 
Topic - NEC
Subject - Article 725: Class 2 and 3 Remote-Control, Signaling, and Power-Limited Circuits (Part 2 of 2)

May 30, 2006  

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz - All New! |  Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
[ image1 Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

Article 725: Class 2 and 3 Remote-Control, Signaling, and Power-Limited Circuits (Part 2 of 2)

 

By Mike Holt for EC&M Magazine

Avoiding confusion with Class 2 and 3 circuits

In the last article, we learned about Class 1, 2, and 3 circuits, but spent most of our time on Class 1. Now, we’re going to focus on Class 2 and 3. Remember, these circuits are defined by their power sources, which must be one of the following:

  1. A listed Class 2 or Class 3 transformer.
  2. A listed Class 2 or Class 3 power supply.
  3. Equipment listed as a Class 2 or Class 3 power source.
  4. Listed information technology equipment.
  5. A dry cell battery rated 30V or less for a Class 2 circuit.

These power sources are listed in 725.41(A)(1) through (5). Item number three has two Exceptions:

  1. Exception 1: Thermocouples.
  2. Exception 2: Limited power circuits. These have an energy level at or below the limits in Chapter 9, Table 11(A) and Table 11(B). This Exception is intended to apply to programmable logic control I/O circuits.

Equipment supplying Class 2 or 3 circuits must be marked to indicate each circuit that is a Class 2 or 3 circuit [725.42].

Remember that the Class 2 or 3 circuit begins at the power supply. That means that conductors and equipment on the supply side of the Class 2 or 3 power source must be installed in accordance with Chapters 1 through 4 [725.51].

Reclassification

You can reclassify Class 2 or 3 circuits as Class 1 circuits simply by eliminating the Class 2 and Class 3 equipment markings required by 725.42, but you must install the entire circuit in a Chapter 3 wiring method [725.55(D)(2)(b)].

But you might not want to do that. If you reclassify these circuits, then you can’t install them with Class 2 or 3 circuits that have not been reclassified as Class 1 [725.55]. Reclassifying the circuit allows the Class 1 circuit to be installed with functionally associated power circuits per 725.26(B)(1).

Separation

Separation helps prevent a fire or shock hazard that could occur from a fault between the Class 2 or 3 circuit and the higher-voltage circuits. You can install Class 2 and 3 cables in the same raceway or enclosure with:

  • Communications cables [800.133(A)]
  • Power-limited fire alarm cables [760.56]
  • Optical fiber cables [770.133(B)]
  • CATV cables [820.133(A)], and
  • Low-power network broadband [See 725.56(E)(5)].

You can not place Class 2 or 3 conductors in any enclosure, raceway, or cable with conductors of electric light, power, Class 1, or nonpower-limited fire alarm circuits, except as permitted in 725.55(B) through (J) (Figure 725-31). For example, you can install Class 2 and 3 circuits in the same enclosure as electric light, power, Class 1, and nonpower-limited fire alarm circuits if they are separated by a barrier (Figure 725-32).

Combinations

Listed Class 2 cables have 150V insulation, whereas listed Class 3 cables are rated 300V [725.82(G)]. This has implications for running Class 2 and 3 together in the same cable, enclosure, or raceway. These implications are spelled out in 725.56.

You can run Class 2 and 3 conductors within the same cable with communications conductors, if the cables are listed as communications cables or multipurpose cables and they are installed per Article 800 [800.113 and 800.133(A)(1)(b)]. A common application of this requirement is when a single communications cable is used for both voice communications and data [725.56(D)(1)] (Figure 725-36).

Class 2 or 3 cables can be in the same raceway or enclosure as jacketed cables of any of the following [725.56(E)]:

  1. Power-limited fire alarm circuits in compliance with Article 760.
  2. Nonconductive and conductive optical fiber cables in compliance with Article 770.
  3. Communications circuits in compliance with Article 800.
  4. Coaxial cables in compliance with Article 820.

Support

Don’t use a raceway to support Class 2 or 3 cables. This is a common code violation, and is not known by many installers and inspectors. Support these cables by the structural components of the building, to prevent damage from normal building use. Secure cables by the appropriate straps, staples, hangers, or fittings—and install them so as not to damage the cable [725.8].

Class 2 control cables can, however, be supported by the raceway that supplies power to the equipment controlled by the Class 2 cable [725.58, 300.11(B)(2)].

Fit the application

Make sure the cable or raceway being used as a wiring method within a building is listed and marked for the application. You’ll find the application rules in 725.61 and the related listing requirements in 725.82. Here are some highlights.

You can’t install Class 2 or 3 cables in constructed ducts or plenums [725.3(C)], unless they act directly on the contained air, are installed using a wiring method described in 300.22(B), and are plenum-rated.

You can install plenum rated-rated cables above a suspended ceiling or below a raised floor used for environmental air [725.61(A)]. You can also install listed plenum-rated raceways above a suspended ceiling or below a raised floor used for environmental air [300.22(C)(2)], but only if the cables contained in these raceways are also plenum-rated, such as Types CL2P or CL3P [725.61(A)] (See Figure 725-42).

To install Class 2 and 3 cables that are not plenum-rated above a suspended ceiling or below a raised floor used for environmental air, you have to put them in a metal raceway [300.22(C)(1)]. Metal raceways containing circuit conductors from a power-supply system that operates at 50V or less aren’t required to be grounded (bonded) to an effective ground-fault current path [250.86 and 250.112(I)].

You can install types CL2, CL2X, CL3, or CL3X cables in locations other than ducts, plenums, or other environmental air spaces in any occupancy. Are you installing cable between more than one floor? Then you use one of the three methods described in 725.61(B).

The requirements for Class 2 and 3 circuits can quickly become mind-boggling, if you don’t approach them methodically. Follow these steps to avoid confusion and code violations:

  1. Understand the power level on the load side, so you can determine if a circuit is Class 1, 2, or 3.
  2. Determine the route of the cabling and raceway. Can you simplify things by avoiding risers and environmental airspace?
  3. Understand the application. Review each of the eight application types in 725.61 to determine which application you have. This will tell you what the rules are for your application.
  4. Follow the listings. Review your planned bill of materials against the requirements of 725.82 to ensure you are using the correct cables and raceways. Note any special installation requirements, such as those noted in 725.82(E).
  5. Review the general requirements for remote control, signaling, and power-limited circuits, before finalizing your design, bill of materials, and work plans.

With this approach, you will find it fairly easy to meet the requirements for Class 2 or 3 circuits. It may be tempting to gloss over these and just get going with the installation. Giving in to that temptation can mean you’ll be ripping out a Class 2 or 3 installation and starting over. Save time by doing the job right the first time. These five easy steps for the designer can prevent one giant leap backward for the crew.

[ View More Newsletters ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

F o r w a r d   t h i s   N e w s l e t t e r   t o   a   F r i e n d !
Do you have a friend, relative, or colleague who you think would be interested in receiving this free newsletter? If so, we encourage you to forward this message along to them. If you received this email from someone else, and wish to receive your own free issues of our newsletter, sign up today!

C o n t a c t    I n f o r m a t i o n
 

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Comments
  • Mike: we do a significant amount of cable tray work in industrial facilities. And we always separate power and low-voltage cable using a separator barrier. However, the main reason is EMI and the power circuits inducing unwanted signals on the signal cable. E.g. we make sure power and signal cables cross only at a 90degree angle and we avoid long runs (+3ft) in parallel without EMI protection.

    We also use -as a general rule- TC-ER rated power cable for the signal circuits with the same rating as the power circuits. However, the rules of 725 allow to use a cable with a significant lesser rating for those signal circuits, and therefore save money on the install.

    Is it correct to say that the rules of 725.55 only apply when the cable of low-power circuits have a low-power rating. But that I can very well cable for power and signal in the same cable tray as long as they meet the required rating of power circuits.

    Thanks, Marcus

    Marcus Daiber
    Reply to this comment

  • > Dear Mr. Holt: > > I appreciate your information on the electrical field. While I am a > "layman" and at sea with most of your stuff I can appreciate the knowledge you > impart to us and at least it reminds me to be extra cautious! > > Now comes the real reason I am writing! I... like all Americans... are > concerned about the slaughter of our troop[s in Iraq and Afghanistan by IED's > (road side bombs)! > > With your electronic background and fellow electrical engineers can't a > device be > created that can send a signal at enough distance to explode the bomb at a > distance that would not be a danger to passing troops! > > With all the miraculous gadgets that we have developed...surely this IED > triggering device should not be beyond the ability of our current electronic > knowledge! > > I can only propose this idea...you have the expertise and associates to do > more! > > Thanks for listening!

    Orlando .Madeira
    Reply to this comment

  • please advise me where i can locate part 1 of 2 article725. thank you

    gary w nehls
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter