This article was posted 01/11/2011 and is most likely outdated.

Putrajaya Minaret Incidents
 

 

Topic - Lightning Protection
Subject - Putrajaya Minaret Incidents

January 11, 2011
This newsletter was sent to 16581 newsletter subscribers

Ask a Question |  Continuing EducationQuizzes |  Free Stuff Instructors Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe
[ image1 Post Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]  

Putrajaya Minaret Incidents

Image1According to the ESE standard, NF C 17-102, the protection zone of the ESE air terminal is shaped like a parabola with the apex at the tip of the air terminal. One way of conducting the “ultimate test” of the ESE standard is to install an ESE air terminal on top of a tall and slender concrete structure where all parts of the structure lay deep within the clamed ESE protection zone. If the ESE standard is correct, then no part of the structure should be struck by lightning.

The minaret of the Putra Mosque is a slender 116 metre high structure with an ESE air terminal installed on the apex and forms the ideal subject for the “ultimate test” of the ESE standard. After observing this structure over a period of a dozen years, it was found that lightning had struck the concrete parts of the minaret several times. This demonstrates that the ESE standard is a defunct air terminal placement method.

Click here to read or download the complete report (610KB, 13 pages)

 

 

 

Click here to post a comment

[ Post Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]
[ View More Newsletters ]

Bookmark and Share


Copyright © Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

 

 
Comments
  • I agree with the report 100 % but i noticed that when using the 150 foot radius in the report it appeared to start at the top of the structure. Using the guidelines in underwriters laboratories UL96A, the 150 radius arc should be tangent to the earth. see 6.6, 6.6a and 6.6b and 6.6c. Using these guidelines you can determine the proper location of required air terminals as well as the areas of protection beneith the arc.

    David Vann
    Reply to this comment

  • There have been similar "failures" with "conventional" Farady Cage installations. Many unknowns still exist in the "science" of lightning protection. Somehow I feel that a possible explanation lies hidden somewhere in Tesla's notes................

    Wyatt
    Reply to this comment

  • A 14" lightning rod would have done no better for protection.

    hwilmoth
    Reply to this comment

  • A 14" lightning rod would have done no better for protection.

    hwilmoth
    Reply to this comment


Get notified when new comments are posted here
* Your Email:
 
        
 
Add Your Comments to this Newsletter
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter