This article was posted 06/28/2006 and is most likely outdated.

Unsafe Electronic Equipment Racking Systems the Norm, not the Exception
 

 
Topic - Grounding and Bonding
Subject - Unsafe Electronic Equipment Racking Systems the Norm, not the Exception

June 28, 2006  

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz - All New! |  Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
[ image1 Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    

 Unsafe Electronic Equipment Racking Systems the Norm, not the Exception

 

Mike,

I want to take this opportunity to thank you for your many well written articles. They provide us with critical knowledge and warnings on many relevant issues. I value your opinion on electrical issues and request a bit of your time addressing what appears to be a ground safety issue with commercially purchased Electronic Equipment Racking Systems. I believe that a rack safety ground should be mandatory on all equipment racks and these systems do not provide or recommend the grounding of their equipment racks.

 

I was an Electrician in the US Navy and for the past 33 years a Hardware Engineer for an aerospace company. While on the job I have received substantial electrical shocks when coming in contact with a number of ungrounded equipment racks containing defective hardware. Even though I haven’t experienced an electrical shock from the current racking systems, when considering the power required for data processing equipment there is a greater potential for an electrical shock. As a point of reference, one (1) of our IBM Blade Server Racks can require eight (8) PDUs, each supplied by a 208 volt 30 amp power cord. If an electrical ground fault should occur in either a PDU, IBM server, third party chassis or a power cord is chafed via one of the server slides, the ungrounded rack would become a dangerous shock hazard.

 

A typical example of an Electronic Equipment Racking System is the IBM T42 Equipment Rack with Power Distribution Units (PDUs). Please note IBM is only an example and definitely not the only company that provides similar racking systems. All of the equipment rack’s metal surfaces are painted, including the mounting rails. The surfaces of the rack mounted PDUs are also painted. These PDUs (32P1766, 32P1736) do not provide ground studs/ground straps, nor is there any bare metal to metal contact made during mounting. The rack is ungrounded except for a possible intermittent ground path through the slide rail of a server chassis, which does not provide the permanent, low-impedance circuit as required by the NEC [250.4(A)(3) and (5)].

 

The IBM Rack Installation Manuals (32P0096, 32P0099) and the Rack PDU manuals (02R2739, 02R2738) do not mention a rack safety ground. I consider this design non-compliant with the National Electrical Code (NEC), ANSI/IEEE STD 142, Mil-HDBK-454 and good engineering practices. In correspondence with IBM, they believe their rack designs are completely compliant and that the racks do not have to be grounded.

 

Since the NEC requires an electrical ground on equipment racks for Information Technology Systems [645.15] and Audio Equipment Racks [640.22], I would think the grounding requirement should also apply to Data Processing Equipment Racks.

 

The following codes justify my position:

 

645.15: All exposed non-current-carrying metal parts of an Information Technology System shall be grounded in accordance with Article 250 or shall be double insulated.

 

640.22: Metal equipment racks and enclosures shall be grounded.

 

250.4(A)(5): Electrical equipment and wiring and other electrically conductive material likely to become energized shall be installed in a manner that creates a permanent, low-impedance circuit capable of safely carrying the maximum ground-fault current likely to be imposed on it from any point on the wiring system where a ground fault may occur to the electrical supply source.

 

ANSI/IEEE STD 142, “IEEE Recommended Practice for Grounding of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems,” Section 2.1.2. states: ”… many personal injuries are caused by electric shock as a result of making contact with metallic members that are normally not energized and expected to remain non-energized. … to avoid exposed shock hazards an equipment ground conductor must be present.”

 

Mil-HDBK-454: “The design and construction of equipment shall insure that all external parts, surfaces, … are at ground potential at all times…,” which implies the need for a rack safety ground.

 

My Position: Each power distribution unit within a rack should be grounded to the rack since they can originate from different power distribution panels. Connecting the green safety ground wire from each power source to the rack would provide a direct connection to the source through the power cord. This would ensure the lowest possible ground fault path.

 

As a work around an external ground wire could be added between the rack and the raised floor metal grid, but this would not provide a direct path to the source nor would it be compliant with NEC 250.102 or 250.134.

 

I am currently using the following work around when a vendor cannot provide a PDU with an appropriate ground connection, which is often the case. I purchase at least one (1) PDU with an appropriate ground stud from a third party vendor providing at least one safety ground for each rack. While this is not the optimum design, it does provide a measure of safety that can prevent injury or death from electrical shock.

 

Please provide guidance relative to this issue and if you find the basis of my concerns valid, consider the establishment of a rack grounding requirement for ALL Equipment Racks as part of the revised NEC.

 

Thank you for your time,

 

Bob Cheke

 

Mike’s Comment: Bob, I agree with you 100% that the metal racks should be grounded (bonded) to an effective ground-fault current path in accordance with 250.2 and 250.4(A)(3) and (5). Maybe this newsletter will get the attention of the industry and it will result in changes in the design of electronic equipment racks as well as enforcement by the AHJ.

[ View More Newsletters ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

F o r w a r d   t h i s   N e w s l e t t e r   t o   a   F r i e n d !
Do you have a friend, relative, or colleague who you think would be interested in receiving this free newsletter? If so, we encourage you to forward this message along to them. If you received this email from someone else, and wish to receive your own free issues of our newsletter, sign up today!

C o n t a c t    I n f o r m a t i o n
 

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

Comments
  • I worked as an electrician for over 16 years before getting my electrical engineering degree and becoming a licensed engineer. My electrician observations are from my own experience as an electrician and from verifying construction compliance with my engienering designs.

    Grounding is not something all electricians understand from an overall perspective. Young journeymen electricains may not know enough to understand ground/bond concepts. NEC 250 is not always clear on the "how" to install grounding and bonding conductors. Some engineers take the "isloated ground" concept literelly and do not connect it to the same point as the equipment ground conductor.

    Computer rooms and rooms containing computer equipment racks should be bonded as good as hospital patient rooms where the panel ground bars of all panels serving these rooms are required to be bonded together. A computer room is the "nerve" center of a company's operation and is vital to their existence. Each room containing computer racks should have a wall mounted ground bar connected to all metal objects in the room, the ground bars of all panels serving equipment in the room, and to the building service grounding point. It is my opion the all exposed metal objects and panel ground bars be at the same potential. In my designs, I require a rack line-up to have a bond wire from the wall mounted ground bar to each end rack and jumpers between all racks in the line-up.

    Think about what happens when a 120 volt phase conductor comes into contact with an unbonded metal rack. Equipment on the same rack connected to another 120 volt phase conductor from the same panel has a difference of potential of 208 volts between phase conductor and the metal frame. A technician working on this equipment could get a jolt of 208 volts instead of 120 volts. Or, two racks side-by-side could be "hot" from two different phases and have 208 volts difference between them. this could be even more dangerous.

    I have seen installations designed by engineers that did not comply with NEC 250.146(D). The isolated ground conductor riser in the building was not intentially connected to the equipment ground riser and was connected to a separate ground point outside the building. I guess they did not realize the shields in data cables would be the unintentional connection path. Thanks for this opportunity to offer my opinions on a serious safety issue.

    Rodney Welch, P.E.

Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter