This article was posted 08/17/2006 and is most likely outdated.

NASA Gets it Wrong!
 

 
Topic - Grounding and Bonding
Subject - NASA Gets it Wrong!

August 17, 2006  

| Ask a Question |  Code Graphic Code Quiz - All New! |  Free Stuff Instructors | Feedback
Online Training Products | Seminars | SubscribeUnsubscribe |
Change Email Address |
[ image1 Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ] Web Page Version [Printer-Friendly]    
NASA Gets it Wrong!

 

 

Public Lessons Learned Entry: 0552

Lesson Info:

  • Lesson Number: 0552
  • Lesson Date: 1997-05-21
  • Submitting Organization: JSC
  • Submitted by: L. Underwood

Subject: Potential Electrical Shock Hazard Involving Light Poles on Streets and in Parking Lots

Description of Driving Event: Several randomly sampled exterior street and parking lot light poles were found to have defective electrical grounds that could result in a potentially lethal electric shock hazard if the pole is touched by a person.

The hazard is primarily a result of two conditions:

  1. The original design of the power distribution circuit lacked an equipment grounding conductor even though the installation met the National Electric Code at the time.
  2. The normal breakdown over time of the materials utilized in the supplemental ground rod which was installed to correct the original design deficiency.

The poles are energized primarily at night, but can be remotely energized for testing and repair during daylight hours. Certain power distribution system failure modes may result in an energized light pole. While it is unlikely to have a combination of a defective grounding condition and a power system fault, the condition can be lethal if the pole becomes energized. However, the shock hazard can be precluded by the installation of an upgraded supplemental ground to the earth.

Lesson(s) Learned:

Supplementary electrical grounding protection for streetlamp structures must be periodically verified.

Recommendation(s):

All personnel should understand the electrical shock hazard presented by an energized light pole. Therefore, do not touch street or parking lot light poles!

Immediate interim measures are being implemented, as follows:

  1. new ground rods are being installed on each light pole on-site,
  2. a temporary means of insulating the base of each pole is being examined
  3. a preliminary report has been requested that will make recommendations for permanent repair or replacement of the existing exterior lighting system.

Approval Info:

  • Approval Date: 1997-05-22
  • Approval Name: Ronald A. Montague
  • Approval Organization: NA3
  • Approval Phone Number: 281-483-8576

Mike’s Comment: Here’s another example where the industry recommends that we drive ground rods (supplementary electrodes – 250.54) for the purpose of reducing electric shock from a ground fault. The statement “However, the shock hazard can be precluded by the installation of an upgraded supplemental ground to the earth.” Is 100% false.

What is required is that an equipment grounding (bonding) conductor be bonded to every metal pole as required by the NEC so that all metal parts are bonded to an effective ground-fault current path [250.2 and 250.4(A)(3)].

I just can’t believe that we (me included) as an industry ever thought that a shock hazard could be precluded by the installation of an upgraded supplementary ground to the earth! Oh well… maybe my work will make a difference in educating the industry as to the danger of this type of thinking.

 

 

 

[ View More Newsletters ] [ Send to a Friend ] [ Please Reply With Your Comments | View Comments | Notify Me When Comments Are Added ]

Copyright © 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual property laws and may not be
displayed or published on the internet without the prior written permission of Mike Holt Enterprises, Inc.

http://www.MikeHolt.com     1-888-NEC-CODE (1-888-632-2633)

To suggest a topic or submit content for a newsletter: nlsuggest@mikeholt.com
Experiencing a Problem? Contact our Webmaster

Comments
  • Mike,If an effective equipment conductor only is installed, the pre-existing faults would not permit the lights to operate.So extensive rewiring might be required.In such cicumstances effective supplemental earths as a temporary measure may be resorted to in order to reduce the shock hazard to the public till the installation is brought in conformity with NEC.

    T.M.Haja sahib
  • Reply from: Mike Holt   
    Thank you for your feedback, but your statement is 100% false. There is no amount of 'earthing' that you can do to reduce a ground-fault to a safe value. The theory that grounding brings the earth and energized metal parts to nearly the same potential is totally false.

    The myth that grounding makes an installation safe has been passed around for over 100 years. NOTHING will make an installation safe against a ground fault, except bonding the metal parts to the source via a low-impedance ground-fault path in accordance with the NEC. As a matter of fact, the NEC specifically states that the earth (grounding) is not suitiable to meet the requirements you state [250.4(A)(5)].

    Please visit www.MikeHolt.com, go to Newsletters, then click on Grounding. Read my Grounding versus Bonding series starting October 5th, 2004.

    Reply from: T.M.Haja sahib   
    Mike,It seems that your grounding and bonding series does not apply to outdoor installations where bare ground could not be bonded.So in order to reduce shock hazard outdoors, earthing with low resistance values,chemical treatment of soil etc may be required in domestic premises.

    Reply from: Mike Holt   
    Since grounding metal parts to the earth does not reduce shock hazard to a safe level, the NEC does not have any requirements to ground outdoor metal parts to the earth.

    Reply from: T.M.Haja sahib   
    Mike,What about NESC?It specifically states earthing of shielded cables above 5kv at regular intervals to safeguard from induced voltages!

    Reply from: Mike Holt   
    This relates to the earthing of the system. I hope you don't think you can make an installation safe from a 5 kV ground fault to metal parts by simply grounding the metal parts to the earth!

    It doesn't work that way. You have to understand the entire system, what it makes it safe from, and how ground faults are cleared. You just keep trying to find a way that the earth will make an installation safe from a ground fault. This topic is closed. I did the best I could to help you and I just don't think you understand the issues.

    Reply from: T.M.Haja sahib   
    Mike,It is seems that NESC does not come under your expertise.That is why you did not comment correctly on my last posting.But seeing that you will never agree,I also give up.Thanks.

    Reply from: Mike Holt   
    The NESC is for utility wiring systems, and like all systems, they are generally recommended that they be grounded to reduce overvoltage conditions. Understand this relates to the 'system' not the metal parts.

    But, it doesn't matter what standard applies. If you take a 5 kV circuit and ground fault it to a metal part and that metal part is grounded, anyone touching that energized metal part will die. Now however, if an equipotential plane is unstalled so that the person touching the energized metal part, then that person should be safe. This is the basis of IEEE 80 which is the standard for substations.

    The issue however has to do with a ground rod at a metal pole to make the installation safe (the metal pole is not a system) from a ground fault. Which of course you can't do.

    You are welcome to test your theory (I have). Just take a ground rod, drive it into the earth, energize it and then measure the potential from the ground rod to the earth, let's say 1, 2 and 3 ft away from the ground rod.

    Review IEEE 142 which explains the reasons for 'system grounding' that the NESC utilizes, which is not the topic of discussiont. By the way, system grounding is to reduce transient system overvoltage to a safe level, not to reduce a ground voltage to a safe level. This is accomplished by equipotential planes and better yet, the clearing of a ground fault. .

    Reply from: T.M.Haja sahib   
    Mike,I have a suggestion.If we continue our discussion long enough,we could publish together our discussion in the form of a booklet.Do you agree?


Reply to this comment
* Your Name:
   Your name will appear under your comments.

* Your Email:
   Your email address is not displayed.
* Comments:

This newsletter is closed to new comments.

Email Notification Options:
Notify me when a reply is posted to this comment
Notify me whenever a comment is posted to this newsletter